Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The question is how to ensure the success of the weekly tracks. I believe one of the keys lies in the definition of a few ideas. "So we don't plan to do anything with the UMP Modifieds in the short term." What is the definition of short term? 5 years? 10 years? 1 year? What is the plan to control costs? DIRT in the Northeast is now experimenting with crate motors for their support classes. Will that be an option they look at here in the midwest? And what of the astronomical costs of fielding a late model on a weekly basis? That line of thinking is kind of what led me to my Econo Late Model post the other day. It seemed to be a pretty good time for the local speedways, as far as car counts and competitiveness were concerned."One of the major reasons we took over UMP is because of their weekly sanctioning organization that we have. Because that is the grassroots. That's where the strength is, and it has to be a trickle-down effect to those tracks. If they are not successful on a weekly basis, the sport's dead. Doesn't matter who you've got racing on a national series."
voigt30 said:It sounds like every track can choose there track tire rule. Hopefully everyone can band together for a tire rule like 20-40 or 40 all 4 corners
Originally Posted by Doug:
How about 55's for Late Models, H's for Modifieds?
I personally like the 40's or 55's idea.
Times you'd run 10's you can just run 20's. Times you'd run 30's you can just run 40's. So where will guys be saving? I don't think the 20-40 tire rule is gonna save guys that much.
couldn't agree moreracin90 said:My biggest issue with this..is they seem to be dodging exactly what they will..or wont do to the classes late models and mods. Anyone know what a DIRT mod is? Expensive as heck..and noone around here builds them. Not to mention the local guys having to buy their chassis. Its a money issue and will once again squeeze more and more people away from racing every week. And thats the big picture..once again..changes cost..memberships cost..how much more cost measures can the average Joe racer handle..before he just says..tha heck with that crap..ill go fishing..then the car counts go bust. And it will happen..if they have their way. I think the local tracks..need to just get their own rules..unify them..put up a good purse..good points fund..and the heck with them if they want to continue racing with a good show of cars.
I agree! Its kinda what I replied on another post.racin90 said:I think the local tracks..need to just get their own rules..unify them..put up a good purse..good points fund..and the heck with them if they want to continue racing with a good show of cars.
RACE39 said:Sanctioning is just a formality, you don't need it. Just run the rules.The point fund for local weekly sanction championships isn't all that.
Tracks don't have to buy into any sanction. They could just use the rules(ump or imca). That way tracks could be unified, but not have to put up with any sanctioning body holding thier hand out to line thier pockets.
If you think about it, how many guys in the STL area(from b-town to mont co.- from godfrey to i55) really give a crap about UMP national points???? Maybe 5%????? Most just buy a membership to get the newsletter to keep up on things going on.
I couldn't have said it better!t.nie said:Use the UMP rules for a basic guideline, but offer some budget alternatives, (Steel Blocks, Crates) much the same as TCS did last year and thrived.
I think TCS proved very well that a sanction is not necessarily needed to have a successful weekly racing program. In some ways, not having one is a benefit.
Thats great for racers w/ 4 bar cars and people that blow there tires off but what about the rest of the drivers that run other setups and driving stiles ? Some of them don't hurt 20's in a feature. 20-40 is a good way to go it gives some flexiblity.How about 55's for Late Models, H's for Modifieds?
Doug said:One thing I see happening is more of a comittment being asked of the local racer. By this, I'm talking about a system similar to the NASCAR Weekly Racing Series, where racers and crew alike had to purchase memberships in order to compete.