You UMP guys out there and others, you think a B mod class would help in UMP and / or IMCA ?
I was thinking a 360 cubes max, no rollers, 23* heads only and steel. Stk blk, no dry sump. Also would it be possable to limit the RPM's you can turn? is it possable?
Limting revs, i think would be an awesome way to keep spec type engine costs down. Very hard to do thou, not quite sure how to accomplish it wihtout the drivers being able to cheat around it with toggle switches etc.
Also for UMP have the B mods run the Hoosier "H" (Hard) compound tires all the way around.
Leave the A mods alone, the way they are now, but add this new class for transitional drivers and low budget racers.
What do ya think? I plan to call UMP and suggest this (for what good it will do) if it is practical and not drive up prices. Because i know that when you begin to spec engines it usually drives prices up (unintentionally, but it does) and the reason for the "low budget class gets lost. Just like Mods have gotten now.
I was thinking a 360 cubes max, no rollers, 23* heads only and steel. Stk blk, no dry sump. Also would it be possable to limit the RPM's you can turn? is it possable?
Limting revs, i think would be an awesome way to keep spec type engine costs down. Very hard to do thou, not quite sure how to accomplish it wihtout the drivers being able to cheat around it with toggle switches etc.
Also for UMP have the B mods run the Hoosier "H" (Hard) compound tires all the way around.
Leave the A mods alone, the way they are now, but add this new class for transitional drivers and low budget racers.
What do ya think? I plan to call UMP and suggest this (for what good it will do) if it is practical and not drive up prices. Because i know that when you begin to spec engines it usually drives prices up (unintentionally, but it does) and the reason for the "low budget class gets lost. Just like Mods have gotten now.