wahooracing
Active Member
If these guys aren't running the stock lowers that they are suppose to what ones are they running?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
As far as Martin's goes, it was a "stock appearing" lower but was an inch too long from what I heard. I'd say Eilers is the same but can't say for sure.as ya all know--I don't go fast enough to crash my mods--there for I never change anything--SO will some one please inform my dumm old azz what is not right regarding the lower a arms on the cars...thank you furrball (looked at me lately--not much FIRE left but plenty of fur
They are legal this year, next year stock must be used. As far as measurements go I'm not sure but they have to meet factory specs.Are the aftermarket lowers legal with usra
No, it's not legal. It must match OEM specs, just as the tubular lowers must as well.From the way it reads in the post from the track looks like they altered where the ball joint mounts. Wasnt originally that way. They altered it. So if it was bought as a longer A arm like from kaiser is that legal? I know they were measuring everyone's control arms. But some are chevelle stubs some metric and some who claim to be nova stub lol. Ok ghey just use nova lowers but you get the drift.
What?Ok so they know the difference between metric and chevelle stubs? Alledged novs stubs and such i take it?