t.nie
Patience Tester
I really have to agree with Brandon Paul on this thread. Simply offering up your opinion of somebody else's opinion doesnt really move the discussion forward. I happen to agree that trying to persuade the IMCA spec motor racers to run for a night at MCS does sound like an idea worth considering. I have no clue where else or how else they might get the count up, really. the bounty is great, but it wont pull guys away from their regular sat night points venue this early in the season when there are track championships at stake. Maybe come July, when some of the top tens realise the track title is out of their reach it might change, but not until then I dont think.
I also think he is right on when he says that beating a field of 7 for the maximum feature points awarded by UMP is not really fair to drivers at other tracks who have to beat fields of 18-24 to get the same reward. That has been an issue with the UMP sanction for some time now, yet UMP shows little interest in addressing the issue. I wonder why?
*And sean? This is all your fault. When I saw your name on this thread, I just HAD to jump in! lol *
I also think he is right on when he says that beating a field of 7 for the maximum feature points awarded by UMP is not really fair to drivers at other tracks who have to beat fields of 18-24 to get the same reward. That has been an issue with the UMP sanction for some time now, yet UMP shows little interest in addressing the issue. I wonder why?
*And sean? This is all your fault. When I saw your name on this thread, I just HAD to jump in! lol *