That's a shame, but you're basically just repeating (and accepting) all the liberal lies and saying you don't have time to discover the truth. That line about tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas is just swill, but I guess if you repeat something enough times it becomes true. I think...
Interesting Liberal Perspective on Auto Racing...
http://www.thestar.com/article/463907 And many of you deny that auto racing will be under attack under an ultra-liberal Obama administration...
And you accuse others of being ignorant of the issues. Check it out...
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/13/obama-tax-cut-refunds-those-who-dont-pay/
I can't wait for you 180 degree, it's a great idea, explanation...
So lowering people's taxes is redistribution of wealth. A tax cut...taking a smaller percentage of people's money from them... is the same as taking one persons money and giving it to another. And Obama understands how unfair it is to have tax cuts, when a lot of people don't even pay taxes...
So, did you all hear Obama's '01 Chicago radio interview?
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
So, how do you Obama supporters explain this? Did he just not mean what he said, again? Or, is "Redistribution of Wealth for Social Justice" an honorable goal of yours?
Well we've heard all the opinion, to the point that we need to put that other thread out of it's misery. I have a theory that the most vocal on the "Are we United?" thread are not in fact the majority in our community. So, talk is cheap... cast your vote!
It's just like the people who buy or build a house right by the interstate highway in the suburbs and then complain and organize for taxpayers to build them noise barrier walls. Our tax money constantly goes to build these walls for the "victims" of highway noise, even though the highway was...
http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2008/10/23/madison/news/1022gcj-council0.txt
Back to my original point related to politics connection and effect on motorsports, read this article about Granite City. If you guys think issues like this and other issues of personal freedom are not...
His decision as a Vietnam War POW to refuse freedom out of concern that he would be exploited for propaganda purposes.
Campaign finance reform
Opposition to earmarks
Early support of the successful surge in Iraq
Are you guys serious? He who has the most bills with his name attached has the most accomplishments and strongest resume for Commander in Chief? I'm starting to think you guys are plants for my side that are just trying to make liberals look silly.